Wednesday, December 9, 4:00 PM 710 Social Sciences
MARIA HOFMANN, German, Scandinavian & Dutch (UMN)
"Recent Genocide Documentaries between Return and Respite of Trauma"
Recent Genoc ide Documentar ies between
Return and Respite of Trauma
Documentary film has undergone a development in the past 15 years that
complicates the notions of fact and fiction in this genre. These ostensibly binary
opposites have been discussed extensively in the 1970s and 80s. The scholarly work
of historian Hayden White and the contributions of Eva Hohenberger and others in
regard to documentary film have revealed that any kind of narrativization of events
(including in historiography and other non-fictional genres) is a form of mediation
that employs similar strategies as fiction. This exposed the claim of an objective or
true history as an unattainable ideal and an unmediated representation of reality as
impossible. Despite these academic realizations, documentary filmmakers continue
to treat their films as purely non-fictional, clearly delineating themselves and their
work from fiction. One reason for this continuous adherence to a more traditional
definition is the danger of relativization, of ultimately undermining any truth claim
when the difference between fact and fiction is completely dismissed.
Recent documentary films, however, have started to embrace and welcome the
similarities to fiction instead of forcefully denying their proximity. These films employ
fictionalizations as their core strategy in order to address and reflect upon a media
situation in which the medium itself has become precarious, and images have lost
their immediate "evidentiary power" (Nichols).
This development shows itself most clearly in films that engage with the topic of
genocide. In the case of the Holocaust for example, viewers are constantly exposed
to an overabundance of images of Nazi atrocities. The initial shocking impact soon
deteriorates to numbness and defensiveness. Susan Sontag warns of the effects of
this excessive exposure and points out that, instead of helping us understand, these
photographs haunt us: "The problem is not that people remember through
photographs but that they remember only the photographs." (113) We have become
Maria Hofmann
used to these iconic pictures to a degree that strips them of their critical potential
and prevents any further engagement. The overpowering effect of these images
paradoxically leads to a detachment from historical facts. An illustrative example is
the photograph of a young girl on the day of her deportation) that was shown and
reproduced in books, news clips, documentaries, and other films, until her face
became the embodiment of the genocide of the Jews.
Only in 1994 was her true identity as a Sinti girl, Settela Steinbach, discovered.
Additionally, this case makes the documentary image even more problematic when
we remember that that the only available footage comes from the perpetrators and
can be staged or falsified.
Filmmaker Harun Farocki addresses these issues in his documentary Respite. He
uses only original footage from the Westerbork transit camp in the Netherlands and
mediates it to a high degree. Instead of simply informing the viewer of the history
Maria Hofmann
surrounding Settela Steinbach's photograph, as a traditional documentary would,
Respite tells us many possible stories, ultimately employing a counterstrategy
consisting of a close reiterative reading of the material that simultaneously reveals
the layers of mediated pictures connected to the images. This film, along with The
Act of Killing (about the Indonesian killings of 1965-66 ) and The Missing Picture
(focusing on the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia) will be the main
subjects of my inquiry as they represent prime examples for this new development
in documentary film that contravenes non-fictional conventions and requires a
framework beyond traditional dichotomies. The Act of Killing, as just one example,
has been strongly criticized for making the perpetrators, who are still in power and
have never been prosecuted for their crimes, the protagonists, letting them reenact
important events. This political and moral controversy is based on a supposed access
to an objective truth, and ultimately on a belief in the reductive and oversimplifying
binary of fact and fiction.
This is why it is important to find an approach that can help avoid the impasse of this
perspective and elevates the discussion by shifting the focus towards a concept of
fictionalization as a strategy that aims to convey the cultural complexity of these
events.
Hofmann received her MA in Comparative Literature from the University in Munich in 2013. Her MA thesis focused on the narratological concept of possible world theory and its application to film studies. She has been a PhD student in the Department for German, Scandinavian & Dutch since 2013. Research interests include narratology, theories of fictionality, documentary film and genocide studies. Her dissertation discusses a new development in documentary films about genocide, and explores how narratological methods can be applied to a this new development which intentionally blurs the boundaries between fact and fiction.